Ahmed Aboul Gheit, Secretary-General of the Arab League, has condemned the targeting of the residence of the UAE’s ambassador in Khartoum, along with any infringement on diplomatic buildings and embassy staff, following international charters and agreements.
In a statement, Aboul Gheit welcomed the Sudanese Armed Forces’ commitment to providing full protection for all embassies and diplomatic premises, adhering to the norms and treaties that govern diplomatic activities.
The Arab League official reiterated the necessity for coordinated international and regional efforts to cease warfare and bloodshed in Sudan.
Aboul Gheit emphasized working towards preserving Sudan’s unity, sovereignty, territorial integrity, and institutional stability.
Arab League’s remarks come at a critical time as Sudan navigates through challenging political and security landscapes, highlighting the importance of protecting diplomatic entities and personnel amidst ongoing tensions.
The Sudanese army has strongly denied accusations from the UAE that its forces bombed the residence of the UAE ambassador in Khartoum.
In an official statement, the Sudanese military asserted that it does not target diplomatic missions, UN facilities, or humanitarian organizations.
Instead, the army accused the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), led by the Daqlo family, of being responsible for these “cowardly and shameful acts.”
According to the statement, the RSF receives backing from certain foreign countries, acting with impunity under international observation.
The army emphasized its commitment to international law, clarifying that it only targets RSF positions in defense of Sudan’s sovereignty and security.
The military also rejected any involvement in attacking diplomatic buildings, reaffirming its stance as a professional force upholding the principles of war.
The UAE condemned the attack on its ambassador’s residence, which it claimed was carried out by a Sudanese military aircraft.
The Emirati government announced plans to file formal complaints with the Arab League, the African Union and the United Nations, describing the incident as a blatant violation of diplomatic immunity.